Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 21, Number 1, 2016

Metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma: Implications for clinical and technical aspects of re-irradiation

Vivek Verma, Rajesh R. Kulkarni, Abhijeet R. Bhirud, Nathan R. Bennion, Rodney D. McComb, Chi Lin

Summary:

A seven-year-old male underwent surgical resection and chemoradiation for average risk medulloblastoma; twelve years later, the presence of a necrotic and infiltrative mass in the same area and invading the brainstem prompted a subtotal resection. Pathology was indicative of glioblastoma. He was then treated with concurrent temozolomide and using biologically effective dose calculations for gross residual tumor tissue in the brainstem as well as brainstem tolerance, a radiotherapy dose of 3750 cGy was chosen, fractionated in twice-daily fractions of 125 cGy each. The gross tumor volume was expanded with a 5 mm margin to the planning target volume, which was also judiciously subtracted from the normal brainstem. He completed his radiotherapy course with subsequent imaging free of residual tumor and continued adjuvant temozolomide and remains under follow-up surveillance. This case underscores the rarity of metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma, of which only five known cases heretofore have been described. We discuss the technicalities of radiotherapy planning in this patient, including common hurdles for radiation oncologists in similar patients.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2016; 21(1) : 84-89


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2