Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 21, Number 5, 2016

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) make a difference in retro-orbital irradiation treatment of patients with bilateral Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Comparative analysis of dosimetric parameters from different radiation techniques

Iñigo San-Miguel, Ruth Carmona, Luis Luque, Raquel Cabrera, Marta Lloret, Francisco Rutllan, Pedro Carlos Lara

Summary:

Background

Graves’ ophthalmopathy is the commonest extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves’ disease. Treatment options include steroid therapy, corrective/decompressive surgery, radiation therapy or combination of these approaches.

Aim

Our purpose was to investigate if retro-orbital irradiation with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) yielded better target coverage and dose sparing to adjacent normal structures compared to 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Lateral Opposing Conformed Fields (LOCF).

Methods

Fourteen consecutive patients diagnosed with bilateral Graves’ ophthalmopathy were prospectively recruited into this study from August 2012 until August 2014. An individual VMAT, 3DCRT and LOF plan was created for each patient. Conformity Index (CI), Homogeneity Index (HI) and other dosimetric parameters of the targets and organs-at-risk (OAR) were analyzed in all 28 orbits compared between the different techniques.

Results

CI generated by VMAT was superior to that produced by 3DCRT(p < .001) and LOF (p < .001). As expected, 3DCRT was also superior to LOF (p = .007). Regarding the OARs sparing dose (lens, globes, retina and lacrimal glands), VMAT showed a significant benefit when compared with 3DCRT and LOCF, with no differences between the two latter techniques.

Conclusions

VMAT should be preferred over 3DCRT and LOF for bilateral Graves’ ophthalmopathy treatment.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2016; 21(5) : 435-440


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2