Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 22, Number 1, 2017

Simulation of positron emitters for monitoring of dose distribution in proton therapy

Mohsen Mashayekhi, Ali Asghar Mowlavi, Sayyed Bijan Jia

Summary:

Aim

The purpose of this work was to estimate the dependency between the produced positron emitters and the proton dose distribution as well as the dependency between points of annihilation and the proton dose distribution.

Background

One important feature of proton therapy is that, through the non-elastic nuclear interaction of protons with the target nuclei such as 12C, 14N and 16O, it produces a small number of positron-emitting radioisotopes along the beam-path. These radioisotopes allow imaging the Bragg peak position which is related to the proton dose distribution by using positron emission tomography.

Methods

In this study, the GEANT4 toolkit was applied to simulate a soft and bone tissue phantom in proton therapy to evaluate the positron emitter productions and the actual annihilation points of β+. Simulation was done by delivering pencil and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) proton beams.

Results

The findings showed that (15O, 11C, 13N) and (11C, 15O, 38K, 30P, 39Ca, 13N) are the most suitable positron emitters in the soft and bone tissue respectively. By increasing the proton energy, the distance between the peak of annihilation profile and Bragg peak is almost constant, but the distance between the Bragg peak position and positron annihilation point peak in bone tissue is smaller than that in the soft tissue. The peak of β+ activity distribution becomes sharper at higher proton energies.

Conclusions

There is a good relationship between the positions of positron annihilation profile and positron emitters radioactive decay. Also, GEANT4 is a powerful and suitable tool for simulation of nuclear interactions and positron emitters in tissues.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2017; 22(1) : 52-57


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2