Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 22, Number 5, 2017

The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus

Neil Richmond

Summary:

Aim

This work assesses the dosimetric accuracy of three commercial treatment planning system (TPS) photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of brass mesh used as a bolus.

Background

Bolus material is used in radiotherapy to provide dose build-up where superficial tissues require irradiation. They are generally water equivalent but high density materials can also be used.

Materials and methods

Dose calculations were performed on Monaco and Masterplan TPS (Elekta AB, Sweden) using phantoms defined by the three DICOM CT image sets of water equivalent blocks (no bolus, 1 layer and 2 layers of brass mesh) exported from the CT scanner. The effect of the mesh on monitor units, build-up dose, phantom exit dose and beam penumbra were compared to measured data.

Results

Dose calculations for 6 and 15 MV photon beams on plain water equivalent phantoms were seen to agree well with measurement validating the basic planning system algorithms and models. Dose in the build-up region, phantom exit dose and beam penumbra were poorly modelled in the presence of the brass mesh. The beam attenuation created by the bolus material was overestimated by all three calculation algorithms, at both photon energies, e.g. 1.6% for one layer and up to 3.1% for two layers at 6 MV. The poor modelling of the physical situation in the build-up region is in part a consequence of the high HU artefact caused by the mesh in the CT image.

Conclusions

CT imaging is not recommended with the brass mesh bolus in situ due to the poor accuracy of the subsequent TPS modelling.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2017; 22(5) : 354-359


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2