Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 6, Number 1, 2001

Analysis of differences between doses calculated and measured in-vivo during irradiation with mantle fields

Litoborski M.

Summary:

Purpose: The aim of this work is to analyse differences between doses calculated and measured in-vivo during irradiation of patients with Hodgkin disease.

Materials and Methods: 76 patients were included into study. Measurements were made from the beginning of September 1999 until the end of December 2000 (each patient had made measurement once or two or three times). Semiconductor detectors (with DPD 510 by Scanditronix) were used during in-vivo dosimetry. Doses were calculated and measured in (1) the centre of the irradiation field; (2) supraclavicular region; (3) mediastinum; (4) lower edge of the field and (5) neck. Patients were irradiated at various accelerators, most of them at Neptun with photons 9 MeV.

Results: All patients were divided into three groups. The criterion of inclusion was the per cent difference between calculated and measured doses average for all dosimetrical points. The ranges for the groups were: 0-5%, 5-10% and over 10 %. The mean per cent differences in the first group of 43 patients was 3.1%, in second of 27 patients - 6.3%, and in third of 6 patients - 17.6% respectively. There was no clear reason, beside an accidental error why for the certain patient difference was much larger than for the another. Mean difference for all groups was equal to 5.3%.

In the table mean per cent differences between doses calculated and measured and their standard deviations (SD) in the whole group of patients are shown for central axis, mediastinum and supraclavicular region.
Conclusion: Mean difference in the whole group of patients shows good agreement between pre-calculated and measured doses, especially for three clinically important regions (table). It is accompanied by low standard deviation which is an indicator of small deviations between doses inside the whole group.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2001; 6(1) : 28-29


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2