Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 9, Number 6, 2004

Quality control of radiotherapy simulators

Witold Skrzyński

Summary:

Introduction: A radiotherapy simulator makes it possible to verify a radiotherapy treatment plan before starting treatment. The aim of this
work was to evaluate the parameters of radiotherapy simulators affecting the precision of simulation.
Material and methods: A test protocol has been prepared based on appropriate IEC norms and the methodology used by service engineers, as well as on previous work undertaken at the Medical Physics Department. Two radiotherapy simulators (Varian Ximatron and Oldelft Simulix) have been regularly tested for a period of over one year.
Results: Tests have shown that on both simulators, precision of laser centrators (light beams indicating the isocenter), field size and telemeter
(light scale indicating the source-to-skin distance) varies over time, which in some situations could lead to significant inaccuracies in simulations.
Inaccuracies observed during the tests were, in most cases, not noticed by the operators. Usually, appropriate adjustments can only be made by service engineers. Other parameters affecting the geometrical precision of simulations have proved to be stable. Evaluation of image quality and X-ray beam parameters did not reveal any significant changes over a one-year period.
Conclusions: Mechanical parameters of radiotherapy simulators need to be tested regularly, with precision of laser centrators, field size
settings and telemeter readings requiring special attention.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2004; 9(6) : 213-216

FULL TXT (PDF: 0,28MB)

« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2