Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 12, Number 6, 2007

Reproducibility of tangential breast fields using online electronic portal images

Ramachandran Prabhakar, Goura K. Rath, Pramod K. Julka, Tharmar Ganesh, Rakesh C. Joshi

Summary:

Background Treatment verification and reproducibility plays a major role in radiotherapy
to achieve better tumour control. Small uncertainties in daily repositioning of
the patients and internal organ motion can lead to discrepancies between the planned and delivered radiation treatments. A factor that influences dose homogeneity and treatment volume is the accuracy of treatment setup. Small deviations in positioning the patient with regard to the beam setup could have a relatively significant impact on the treatment volume and it is imperative to control the setup error during radiotherapy. This study focuses on the importance of inter- and intra-fraction error in tangential breast radiotherapy with an electronic
portal imaging device.
Aim To study the variation in treatment setup due to intra-fraction and inter-fraction
during tangential fi eld breast irradiation.
Materials/Methods Twelve patients of carcinoma breast were selected for this study and CT based planning was performed with simple tangential fields. The patients were treated
on a 6MV linear accelerator equipped with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Portal images were acquired for both medial and lateral tangential fields for 10 fractions and intra- and inter-fraction studies were performed for all the patients. Parameters such as central lung distance (CLD), central beam edge to skin distance (CBESD), central irradiated width (CIW) and cranio-caudal distances (CCD) were measured on the acquired portal image.
Results The average systematic differences observed for CLD, CBESD, CCD and CIW
were 1.2mm, 2.8mm, 2.07mm and 3.30mm. For intra-fraction motion, the observed
standard deviations for CLD, CBESD and CCD were 0.7mm, 0.73mm, and 1.36mm. Similarly the CLD, CBESD, CIW and CCD were analyzed for inter-fraction variation.
Conclusions The online portal imaging device is an important tool for ensuring the proper
delivery of planned dose. Our results suggest that intra-fraction motion of the breast has less impact on the treatment volume. Regular treatment verification between treatment fractions will help in reducing the normal tissue toxicity and ensures proper dose delivery to the tumour volume.
Key words breast cancer • tangential fi eld radiotherapy • setup error • EPID

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2007; 12(6) : 323-328

FULL TXT (PDF: 0,13MB)

« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2