Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 13, Number 3, 2008

The evaluation of 3DRT and IMRT techniques in postoperative radiotherapy for thyroid medullary carcinoma thyroid medullary carcinoma

Dorota GABRYŚ,  Iwona WESOŁOWSKA, Rafał SUWIŃSKI

Summary:

BACKGROUND: Radical surgical excision is the treatment of choice in all medullary thyroid carcinomas. External beam radiotherapy for medullary thyroid carcinoma is necessary in advanced cases. Unfortunately, a large volume of the head and neck region which has to be irradiated is close to critical structures such as the spinal cord, larynx, and parotid glands, which creates a challenge during radiotherapy planning.
AIM: The aim of the study is to compare IMRT and 3D plans of patients diagnosed with medullary thyroid carcinoma in terms of CTV coverage and normal tissue sparing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 46-year-old woman with medullary thyroid carcinoma, stage pT4a N1b M0, underwent radical resection, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to a total dose 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV). Three plans were generated to irradiate the thyroid bed and regional lymph nodes. Two intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DRT) plans were compared in terms of CTV coverage and organ at risk sparing.
RESULTS: Using the IMRT plans we achieved more homogeneous dose distribution with higher minimal dose and lower maximal dose in the target volume compared to 3DRT technique. Furthermore, mean and maximal dose to critical structures were lower when IMRT was applied compared to 3DRT.
CONCLUSIONS: IMRT results in improved dose distribution within CTV compared to 3DRT. With the IMRT plan it is also possible to reduce the dose to the organ at risk, especially the larynx, salivary glands and spinal cord.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2008; 13(3) : 126-129

FULL TXT (PDF: 0,16MB)

« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2