Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 13, Number 3, 2008

Clinical outcome of three fractionation schedules of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer

Iwona WZIĘTEK, Jerzy WYDMAŃSKI, Rafal SUWIŃSKI

Summary:

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and normal tissue reactions of three fractionation schedules of preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, 168 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated as follows: 53 patients received 25 Gy in 5 Gy per fraction (group A), 45 received 30 Gy in 3.0 Gy per fraction (group B), and 70 were treated with accelerated hyperfractionation: 42 Gy, 1.5 Gy per fraction, given twice a day with an inter-fraction interval of 6 hours (group C). The clinical characteristics of the groups were comparable. The patients did not receive concurrent chemotherapy.
A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the factors which may infl uence loco-regional tumour control (LRC) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The following variables signifi cantly infl uenced LRC: fractionation scheme (5-year LRC 80%, 69%, and 90% in groups A, B, C respectively, p=0.016), haemoglobin concentration before radiotherapy (p= 0.012) and postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.01). Age, sex, stage of disease, location of tumour (distance of the tumour from the anal verge) and performance status did not appear signifi -cant for LRC. The overall 5-year OS was 64%, 59% and 74% in groups A, B, C respectively (p=0.056). The OS was significantly infl uenced by postoperative pathological stage (p=0.006), tumour location (p= 0.015) and postoperative chemotherapy (p=0.047). The most frequent acute radiation reaction was mild/severe diarrhoea, which appeared in 5%, 21.6% and 65.5% of the patients from groups A-C respectively. The median wound healing time in those who underwent abdomino-perineal resections was 6, 6 and 4 weeks. Other reactions appeared less relevant. There was no signifi cant difference in
the incidence of late effects among the three treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: While due to the non-randomized character of the study the conclusions should be regarded as hypothesis-generating only, the analysis has shown an acceptable local effectiveness and tolerance of schedules A and C, and disappointing effectiveness of schedule B. The present study thus supports the data which suggest that the clinical effect of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer is infl uenced not only by total radiation dose but also by overall radiation treatment time and dose per fraction.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2008; 13(3) : 135-143

FULL TXT (PDF: 0,39MB)

« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2