Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 16, Number 1, 2011

Anatomy - corresponding method of IMRT verification

Janusz Winiecki, Zbigniew Żurawski, Barbara Drzewiecka, Krzysztof Ślosarek

Summary:

Background : During a proper execution of dMLC plans, there occurs an undesired but frequent effect of the dose locally accumulated by tissue being significantly different than expected. The conventional dosimetric QA procedures give only a partial picture of the quality of IMRT treatment, because their solely quantitative outcomes usually correspond more to the total area of the detector than the actually irradiated volume.

Aim: The aim of this investigation was to develop a procedure of dynamic plans verification which would be able to visualize the potential anomalies of dose distribution and specify which tissue they exactly refer to.

Materials & methods: The paper presents a method discovered and clinically examined in our department. It is based on a Gamma Evaluation concept and allows accurate localization of deviations between predicted and acquired dose distributions, which were registered by portal as well as film dosimetry. All the calculations were performed on the self-made software GammaEval, the γ-images (2-dimensional distribution of γ-values) and γ-histograms were created as quantitative outcomes of verification.

Results: Over 150 maps of dose distribution have been analyzed and the cross-examination of the gamma images with DRRs was performed.

Conclusions: It seems, that the complex monitoring of treatment would be possible owing to the images obtained as a cross-examination of γ-images and corresponding DRRs.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2011; 16(1) : 1-9


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2