Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 16, Number 6, 2011

A study on dosimetric properties of electronic portal imaging device and its use as a quality assurance tool in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Prabakar Sukumar, Sriram Padmanaban, Prakash Jeevanandam, S.A. Syam Kumar,
Vivekanandan Nagarajan

Summary:

Aim: In this study, the dosimetric properties of the electronic portal imaging device were
examined and the quality assurance testing of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy was
performed.
Background: RapidArc involves the variable dose rate, leaf speed and the gantry rotation. The
imager was studied for the effects like dose, dose rate, field size, leaf speed and sag during
gantry rotation.
Materials and methods:
A Varian RapidArc machine equipped with 120 multileaf collimator
and amorphous silicon detector was used for the study. The characteristics that are variable
in RapidArc treatment were studied for the portal imager. The accuracy of a dynamicmultileaf
collimator position at different gantry angles and during gantry rotation was examined
using the picket fence test. The control of the dose rate and gantry speed was verified using
a test field irradiating seven strips of the same dose with different dose rate and gantry
speeds. The control over leaf speed during arc was verified by irradiating four strips of different
leaf speeds with the same dose in each strip. To verify the results, the RapidArc test
procedure was compared with the X-Omat film and verified for a period of 6 weeks using
EPID.
Results: The effect of gantry rotation on leaf accuracy was minimal. The dose in segments
showed good agreement with mean deviation of 0.8% for dose rate control and 1.09% for
leaf speed control over different gantry speeds.
Conclusion: The results provided a precise control of gantry speed, dose rate and leaf speeds
during RapidArc delivery and were consistent over 6 weeks.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2011; 16(6) : 248-255


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2