Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 18, Number 4, 2013

Empirical estimation of beam-on time for prostate cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy

Małgorzata Skórska, Tomasz Piotrowski

Summary:

Background and aim: This study proposed a method to estimate the beam-on time for prostate
cancer patients treated on Tomotherapy when FW (field width), PF (pitch factor), modulation
factor (MF) and treatment length (TL) were given.
Material and methods: The study was divided into two parts: building and verifying the model.
To build a model, 160 treatment plans were created for 10 patients. The plans differed in
combination of FW, PF and MF. For all plans a graph of beam-on time as a function of TL was
created and a linear trend function was fitted. Equation for each trend line was determined
and used in a correlation model. Finally, 62 plans verified the treatment time computation
model – the real execution time was compared with our estimation and irradiation time
calculated based on the equation provided by the manufacturer.
Results: A linear trend function was drawn and the coefficient of determination R2 and the
Pearson correlation coefficient r were calculated for each of the 8 trend lines corresponding
to the adequate treatment plan. An equation to correct the model was determined to
estimate more accurately the beam-on time for different MFs. From 62 verification treatment
plans, only 5 disagreed by more than 60 s with the real time from the HT software.
Whereas, for the equation provided by the manufacturer the discrepancy was observed in
16 cases.
Conclusions: Our study showed that the model can well predict the treatment time for a given
TL, MF, FW and it can be used in clinical practice.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2013; 18(4) : 201-208


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2