Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 18, Number 4, 2013

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis

Ramachandran Prabhakar, Milind Kumar,  Suja Cheruliyil, Silpa Jayakumar, Satheesan Balasubramanian, Jim Cramb

Summary:

Aim: To study the use of RapidArc techniques in the treatment of prostate cancer patients
with hip prosthesis.
Background: An important aspect of treatment planning is to achieve dose homogeneity
inside the planning target volume (PTV). Especially for those patients presenting with hip
prosthesis, it becomes a challenging task to achieve dose uniformity inside the PTV.
Materials and methods: Five prostate patients presenting with hip prosthesis who had undergone radical radiotherapy were selected for this study. Depending on the composition of
prosthesis, a predefined set of Hounsfield values were assigned to each study set. RapidArc
plans were generated on an Eclipse treatment planning system. Two arcs that include
clockwise and counter-clockwise arcs were used in all these cases. To avoid beams passing
through the prosthesis, a simple structure was defined around it with 1 cm margin and a
strict dose constraint applied to the block during VMAT optimization.
Results: The mean D2/D98 ratio of PTV for all the patients was 1.06 ± 0.01. The mean percentage rectum volume receiving 50 Gy, 60 Gy, 70 Gy and 75 Gy for all the patients were 33.1 ± 5.9, 21.7 ± 5.5, 13.8 ± 4.4 and 9.5 ± 3.0, respectively.
Conclusions: This study shows that using a double arc RapidArc technique is a simple and
effective treatment method of treating prostate cancer in patients presenting with a hip
prosthesis. The definition of a beam avoidance structure encompassing the prosthesis and
applying strict dose constraints to it reduces the beam contribution to the prosthesis

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2013; 18(4) : 209-213


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2