Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 19, Number 3, 2014

An institutional experience of quality assurance of a treatment planning system on photon beam

Yıldıray Özgüven, Kadir Yaray, Fadime Alkaya, Birsen Yücel, Serdar Soyue

Summary:

Aim

The purpose of the present study is to show the application of the IAEA TRS-430 QA procedures of Eclipse™v7.5 TPS for photon energies. In addition, the trends of the deviations found in the conducted tests were determined.

Background

In the past, the lack of complete TPS QA procedures led to some serious accidents. So, QA in the radiotherapy treatment planning process is essential for determination of accuracy in the radiotherapy process and avoidance of treatment errors.

Materials and methods

The calculations of TPS and measurements of irradiations of the treatment device were compared in the study. As a result, the local dose deviation values (δ1: central beam axis, δ2: penumbra and build up region, δ3: inside field, δ4: outside beam edges, δ50–90: beam fringe, RW50: radiological width) and their confidence limit values (including systematic and random errors) were obtained.

Results

The confidence limit values of δ4 were detected to increase with expanding field size. The values of δ1 and δ3 of hard wedge were larger than open fields. The values of δ2 and δ50–90 of the inhomogeneity effect test were larger, especially than other tests of this study. The average deviation was showed to increase with the rise of the wedge angle. The values of δ3 and δ4 of lung irradiation were outside tolerance.

Conclusions

The QA of TPS was done and it was found that there were no reservations in its use in patient treatment. The trend of the deviations is shown.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2014; 19(3) : 195-205


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2