New - fast track review!
Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak ( for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 22, Number 3, 2017


  • The semiconductor diode detector response as a function of field size and beam angle of high-energy photons

    Tomasz Koper, Anna Kowalik, Sebastian Adamczyk
    p. 193-200
  • CT- and MRI-based gross target volume comparison in vestibular schwannomas

    Bhudevi Soubhagya N. Kulkarni, Harjot Bajwa, Mukka Chandrashekhar, Sunil Dutt Sharma, Rohith Singareddy, Dileep Gudipudi, Shabbir Ahmad, Alok Kumar, N.V.N. Madusudan Sresty, Alluri Krishnam Raju
    p. 201-208
  • Retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness of radiotherapy in patients with plantar fascitis (heel spurs)

    Piotr Kędzierawski, Rafał Stando, Paweł Macek
    p. 209-211
  • Estimation of peripheral dose from Co60 beam in water phantom measured in Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shahban, Babar Hussain, Khalid Mehmood, Shakeel Ur Rehman
    p. 212-216
  • Prospective evaluation of anxiety, depression and quality of life in medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

    Jacek Rutkowski, Magdalena Szymanik, Maciej Blok, Joanna Kozaka, Renata Zaucha
    p. 217-222
  • Dosimetric impact in the dose–volume histograms of rectal and vesical wall contouring in prostate cancer IMRT treatments

    Laura Gómez, Carlos Andrés, Antonio Ruiz
    p. 223-230
  • Coping with loss of ability vs. acceptance of disease in women after breast cancer treatment

    Katarzyna Cieślak, Wojciech Golusiński
    p. 231-236
  • Is immunohistochemical evaluation of p16 in oropharyngeal cancer enough to predict the HPV positivity?

    Paweł Golusiński, Jakub Pazdrowski, Mateusz Szewczyk, Maciej Misiołek, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Janusz Klatka, Sławomir Okła, Henryk Kaźmierczak, Andrzej Marszałek, Violetta Filas, Augusto Schneider, Michał M. Masternak, Katarzyna Stęplewska, Katarzyna
    p. 237-242
  • Comparison of surface dose delivered by 7 MV-unflattened and 6 MV-flattened photon beams

    Ashokkumar Sigamani, Arunai Nambiraj
    p. 243-250
  • Prognostic correlation of cell cycle progression score and Ki-67 as a predictor of aggressiveness, biochemical failure, and mortality in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy

    Iván Henríquez López, David Parada, Pablo Gallardo, Marina Gascón, Arnau Besora, Karla Peña, Francesc Riu, Miquel Arquez Pianetta, Oscar Abuchaibe, Laura Torres Royò, Meritxell Arenas
    p. 251-257
  • Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography image quality assurance for Vero4DRT system

    Hideharu Miura, Shuichi Ozawa, Masahiro Hayata, Shintarou Tsuda, Tsubasa Enosaki, Kiyoshi Yamada, Yasushi Nagata
    p. 258-263

« back